IP Law 360

JANUARY 13, 2023

A Maryland federal jury on Thursday found New York women's athletic wear company Armorina Inc. liable for infringing and diluting sports apparel giant Under Armour Inc.'s s "Armour" marks, but concluded that the infringement wasn't willful and awarded Under Armour only $1 in damages.

40

40

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2021

North American Marketing, Inc. El Cinco, Inc. AOVM Companies. Luxco, Inc. Epic Games, Inc. Under Armour, Inc. Spectrum Brands, Inc. Momentive, Inc. Engcon Holding AB. POLYPHENOL-C. Gallo Winery. RL Brands, LLC. Bloomberg L.P. Radix IoT, LLC. Radix DLT Limited. Fleet Associates.

Branding 52

Branding Brands Branding Trademark 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 14, 2023

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. Claims: Infringement Defendants: Advance Auto Parts, Inc. Judge: Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim Claims: Declaratory Judgment Defendants: Locket IP LLC Plaintiff: Bungalow Living, Inc. Payne Claims: Infringement Defendants: Moog, Inc. ParkHelp USA, Inc. Stahl, Inc. Office Depot, Inc.

Reporting 52

Reporting Litigation Patent Licensing 52

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2023

The Delhi High Court’s order in Under Armour v. In this case, the plaintiff is a publishing company that claimed that defendant No. Case: Burger King Company Llc vs Virendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. Aditya Birla Fashion states that the FER and its Reply are only relevant in limited circumstances! Zlib.Org And Ors.

Confidentiality 105

Confidentiality Trademark Copyright Patent 105