Remove Copying Remove Fanworks Remove Law Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Too Rusty For Krusty–Nickelodeon v. Rusty Krab Restaurant (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Walking Mountain (affectionately known as the “Barbie in a Blender” case) noted that “every court to address the issue whether a defendant’s work qualifies as a parody has treated this question as one of law to be decided by the court.” Defining the scope of Viacom’s trademark rights more explicitly might not change the outcome.

article thumbnail

IPSC Breakout Session #2: mostly copyright and then marijuana innovation

43(B)log

Cariou is still arguably good law w/the exception of the relevance of artist’s intent. The majority says that limiting doctrines account for Kagan’s examples—which involved use of expression—as well as the dissent’s own copying and the Court’s too. A: but the holding is specific that this is only about licensing in commercial markets.

article thumbnail

Copyright Office Technical Measures Consultations

43(B)log

Unique expertise on code too; code is different from photos, music, videos; some of the most valuable code on GitHub is licensed openly. Remediation not removal is often the goal—changes to the code rather than removing often resolves the problem, e.g. addressing violation of open source license by adding attribution etc.