Remove Copyright Infringement Remove Moral Rights Remove Public Domain Remove Publishing
article thumbnail

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat the past 2 weeks!

The IPKat

The IPKat has published several posts over the past two weeks! COPYRIGHT Katfriend Moritz Sutterer posted on a new competition tool that the German Competition Authority recently tried out against Google in relation to press publishers' neighbouring right.

article thumbnail

Conundrum Involving The Ownership Of The Work Created By Ai

IP and Legal Filings

AI can explore data or information that is accessible in public domain or copyright of other person and can investigate or work upon that information but only to that extent which the software program permits. [3] Therefore, AI may not equipped for generating an original work. Hence, ownership is not granted to the AI.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Metadata Ruling Gives YouTube a Timely Boost in Content ID Lawsuit

TorrentFreak

Code § 1202 prohibits the intentional removal of CMI without obtaining permission from the copyright owner, when it is known that will “induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement.” Jackson believes the nature of the platform where the content was published could also provide guidance. ——-.

article thumbnail

The Modern Copyright Dilemma: Digital Content Ownership and Access

IP and Legal Filings

The first codified statute dealing with copyright protection of printed books dates back to 1710, known as British Statute of Anne. As the world’s first copyright statute, it offered 14 years of legal protection for works published and 21 years of protection for works already in print.

article thumbnail

YouTube/Cyando – Lessons for the Egyptian Copyright Legislator

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The so-called “conditional irresponsibility” of online content-sharing service providers (OCSSPs) with regards to copyright infringements is a never-ending, vexing, and daunting topic not only for scholars (see here , here , here and here ), but also for the European Court of Justice itself (CJEU). 147 ECL) and moral rights (art.

Copyright 103