USC IP year in review, TM/ROP
43(B)log
OCTOBER 4, 2021
That imported secondary meaning—usually imported via immigrants who remember a mark from back home—might justify either restrictions on how a US defendant with US rights could use the mark in the US or invalidation of the US rights as a whole and a total prohibition on the defendant’s use—this is the question in the Bayer v.
94 
Let's personalize your content