Remove international-pct-application
article thumbnail

Principals Moritz Ammelburg and Peter Fasse Author Managing IP Article “Coordinating Patent Prosecution in the U.S. and Europe”

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Moritz Ammelburg and Peter Fasse examine the patentability requirements and prosecution schemes in the US and Europe and how applicants can prepare applications that will best serve their needs in both jurisdictions. Under the Paris Convention and the PCT, whoever files an application is called the applicant.

article thumbnail

Chinese Utility Models, Strengthening and Supplementing Intellectual Property Protection in China

LexBlog IP

However, utility models can be more stable and enforceable than invention patents in certain circumstances when properly used. Often, international entities, especially in North America and Europe, where utility model systems are unavailable, underestimate the additional value added to their portfolio by utility models.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Claim Amendments u/s 59(1): Confusingly Evolving Landscape in India- Part II

SpicyIP

The ratio set by them are so diverse that, in an adversarial proceeding such as patent prosecution or litigation, the opposite parties may pick their respective chosen or desired positions based on any of them, and no clear conclusion could be arrived at. 31, emphasis added].

article thumbnail

When Will My Patent Expire? – Calculating Your Patent Term – A Review

More Than Your Mark

patents (other than design patents) issued from applications filed on or after June 8, 1995, is defined by the “twenty-year term,” which is subject to adjustment due to various factors: type of application (utility, design, plant); filing date of the application; issue (grant) date of the patent; benefit claims under 35 U.S.C.

Patent 40