Remove topics counterparties
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and creativity in visual art: what are the protectability requirements? Part 1: the Italian Supreme Court’s “floral fractal” case

Kluwer Copyright Blog

To this end, the counterparty’s admission of having used software to generate the image is not sufficient for allowing the Supreme Court (as judge of legitimacy and not of merits) to further investigate this argument, since such admission is still compatible with the elaboration of an intellectual work with a sufficient degree of creativity.

Art 75
article thumbnail

Optis v Apple Trial E (Part I): findings on specific issues and topics

The IPKat

Findings on specific issues and topics Data regarding the stack Data regarding the stack could not be obtained directly from ETSI. The Judge noted that Optis’ assertion on the quality of its portfolio would have had very limited effect on a sophisticated counterparty, but it would have applied pressure against a smaller one ([200], iv).

Patent 78