Remove topics graham-factors
article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

Reiterating the Central Role of Graham v. The updated guidance underscores that the factual inquiries set forth by the Supreme Court in Graham v. Thus, while KSR mandated a more flexible approach, the Graham factors still form the foundation of any obviousness analysis. John Deere. John Deere Co.,

Art 121
article thumbnail

Jury Instructions and Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness: Federal Circuit Grants New Trial in Inline Plastics v. Lacerta

Patently-O

Courts typically consider various factors in the obviousness analysis, known a the Graham Factors. See Graham v. These factors are relevant only if there is a connection, or nexus, between the factor and the invention covered by the patent claims. John Deere Co. , And I think they’re very meaningful.

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 6: IP Theory

43(B)log

Expected to find a lot of talking around the topic of pleasure, but surprised to find a lot of hostility to, especially, defendants’ enjoyment of their own conduct. Argument for change to factor 4, that growing a market/market benefits should matter. Giving pleasure can found patentability; use that!

IP 59