Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 17, 2021

Instead, judge simply says the Second Circuit hasn’t addressed the topic. The court acknowledges the precedent applying the ADA to retailers’ websites, but it doesn’t extend to a standalone content website. The opinion cites the 2015 NFB v. Scribd precedent but doesn’t distinguish it. Case citation : Suris v.

Blogging 126

Blogging Television Publishing Advertising 126

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

APRIL 1, 2023

This ruling covers two key topics related to 512. Viacom * Updates on Transborder Copyright Enforcement Over “Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer”–Shropshire v. Because of these deficiencies, the court says: “The copyright note is not a DMCA notice under § 512. And without a DMCA notice, § 512(f) does not apply.”

Fair Use 101

Fair Use Cease and Desist Contracts Ownership 101

The IPKat

DECEMBER 5, 2021

While one could debate this topic from a non-legal standpoint (and perhaps we will return to it), one (unsolicited) question might be: What would have happened if Spotify had not agreed to remove the " shuffle " feature at Adele's request and she had decided to take her reasons to the legal level?

Moral Rights 143

Moral Rights Music Television Copyright 143