2003, Copyright Infringement, Derivative Work and Trademark Law

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2003

Derivative Work

Trademark Law

New Tools, Old Rules: Is The Music Industry Ready To Take On AI?

MAY 1, 2023

Chrissy uses voice conversion software to convert the SpongeBob track and ends up with something atrocious like this: AI Drake imitating Drake, imitating SpongeBob Copyright Law, What Say You? No wonder I’m getting flashbacks to 2003. Soundalikes: No Actual Sounds, No Actual Infringement?

Music

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

The report notes on page 11 that “In 2003, research estimates put the [U.S.] Second , it has been argued that the court merely espoused the settled principles of trademark law that ‘common’ names and phrases cannot be monopolized. ” Ginsburg (2003) at 1086-87. ’”(emphasis added).

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Pulse

New Tools, Old Rules: Is The Music Industry Ready To Take On AI?

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

Stay Connected