Remove 2003 Remove Litigation Remove Patent Application Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

Governance and Supervision of Trademark and Patent Agents: Discussing DHC’s Saurav Chaudhary vs. Union Of India

SpicyIP

First thing first, let’s unfold the case: The case involves a writ petition challenging the abandonment of a patent application and praying for its restoration. Here, the background is that the Petitioner hired Mr. Naveen Chaklan of M/s Delhi Intellectual Property LLP to deal with his patent application.

article thumbnail

Understanding Freedom to Operate (FTO) Concerning IP & Patents

Kashishipr

Three pharmaceutical companies, including Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Micromet AG, and Cambridge Antibody Technology (now acquired by AstraZeneca), in September 2003 announced signing a non-exclusive cross-license agreement. Without any doubt, stepping into patent litigation can be uncertain, full of risks, and expensive.

IP 105
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 8- May 13)

SpicyIP

Gaurangi Kapoor highlights the key aspects of the litigation and writes on the findings of the court. The petitioner is the sole registered proprietor and user of the “Maxgalin” mark, a Schedule H drug, since 2005. on 8 May, 2023 The plaintiff alleged infringement of registered trademark PANTOCID.

Trademark 104