Remove 2004 Remove Artistic Work Remove Copyright Law Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Interaction Between Ai And Copyright : Who Has The Copyright In Ai?

IP and Legal Filings

In this article I will look into two main questions, firstly, who owns/ who should own the copyright in AI (ii) whether AI satisfies the criteria of human element in AI. Works covered by copyright range from books, music, paintings, sculpture and films, to computer programs, databases, advertisements, maps and technical drawings.

article thumbnail

The Choice Of Law Debate In Copyright Infringement

IP and Legal Filings

Since copyright is “universal”, some argue that the lex originis should be utilised to determine who owns works that have been plagiarised. Since copyright in whatever form (even first ownership) is subject to the territoriality principle, many argue that lex loci protectionis is the appropriate course of action. [10]

article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights: the USPTO DABUS decision

Barry Sookman

a curious male crested black macaque” named Naruto was denied copyright protection for a photograph by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Naruto v Slater 888 F.3d 2004), a U.S. Nonetheless, the selection of the contents by the creating group met the requirement of creation under the copyright law. In the U.S., “a