2004, Cease and Desist, Confidentiality and Designs

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2004

Cease and Desist

Confidentiality

Designs

No IP, no right to information? CJEU to clarify scope of article 8 Enforcement Directive

The IPKat

JANUARY 31, 2022

Under article 8(1) of the Enforcement Directive (Directive 2004/48/EC) a claimant in infringement proceedings can request a court to order certain parties to disclose information. This so-called ‘right to information’ includes information on the origin of the infringement (e.g. One image is depicted below.

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Cease and Desist IP Copyright

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 15, 2021

In 2004, the Ninth Circuit eviscerated it (in the Rossi case) by requiring plaintiffs to show that senders subjectively believed their takedown notices were abusive. The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. Diebold from 2004, which led to a $125k damages award. A New 512(f) Plaintiff Win!

Registration

Intellectual Property Pulse

No IP, no right to information? CJEU to clarify scope of article 8 Enforcement Directive

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Stay Connected