IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2023

Trademark Dilution A well-known brand’s owner has the legal authority to forbid third parties from using their mark since doing so compromises their exclusivity or damages their reputation. In reality, no one has the right to imitate any well-known brand or to misuse that trademark’s good name. Blurring Tarnishing 1.Blurring

Trademark 70

Trademark Branding Brands Branding 70

Patently-O

JULY 17, 2022

Hypo : Copycat would like to copy Competitor’s product. And, for the most part, the content of the generic label is derived directly from the brand-patentee’s label. GSK had patent rights covering all three uses, but by 2007 the patents covering uses (2) and (3) had expired. Teva Pharms. 22-37 (2022). Caraco (2012).

Branding 58

Branding Brands Branding Marketing 58

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 20, 2023

Lewis Hamilton joined Formula 1 in 2007. They also lacked information on the number of copies sold and their distribution among the general public or the number of online views. The BoA concluded that consumers could believe that the contested application is a sub-brand of the earlier mark. 128 et seqq.).

Art 105

Art Branding Brands Branding 105

The TTABlog

JUNE 10, 2021

Nonetheless, applicant argued that relevant consumers perceive COOKINPELLETS.COM as its brand name," and the evidence showed that some third-parties use or understand COOKINPELLETS (with or without a space) and COOKINPELLETS.COM as capable of serving as a source indicator. In re Gould Paper Corp., 2d 1017, 5 USPQ2d 1110, 1112 (Fed.

Advertising 52

Advertising Advertising Social Media Marketing 52

43(B)log

APRIL 28, 2022

He also hosted a reunion and golf tournament in 2007 and engaged in other referential activities; he managed royalties from the licensed USFL apparel from 2011-2021. They have also entered into numerous business partnerships and relationships for ticketing, advertising and apparel sales.”

Licensing 45

Licensing Advertising Advertising Registration 45

LexBlog IP

JULY 5, 2022

In the event that infringement occurs, a designer must show that the infringer copied the designers copyrighted work. [5] § 102(a); see also Pride Family Brands, Inc. The term of a copyright for a particular work may depends on certain factors such as whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. [2]

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Design Patent Designs Design 52

Above the Fold

JULY 5, 2022

In the event that infringement occurs, a designer must show that the infringer copied the designers copyrighted work. [5] 102(a); see also Pride Family Brands, Inc. The term of a copyright for a particular work may depends on certain factors such as whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. [2]

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property Design Patent Designs Design 40