Remove 2009 Remove Cease and Desist Remove Litigation Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Apple Watch Stays on US Market, But Pulse-Ox Disabled Pending Appeal

Patently-O

2024) ( Apple Stay Denial ) After initially granting a temporary reprieve, the Federal Circuit has now denied Apple’s stay pending appeal of the International Trade Commission’s limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist order (“the Remedial Orders”) against Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2. 418 (2009). See Nken v.

Marketing 113
article thumbnail

ITC Litigation: Introduction to Trade Secret Protection at the ITC

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

We have covered several introductory topics about 337 Investigations at the International Trade Commission (ITC) through the lens of its most common context [1] —as another forum for patent litigation. [2] 3] However, patent litigation is but one potential use of this forum. What are the Benefits of Litigating at the ITC?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Trademark Infringement in the Digital Age

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction In today’s digital economy, trademarks play an important role in developing a brand’s identity, establishing customer trust, and assuring market competition. The accessibility of Internet markets and the ease with which information may be shared have given rise to new opportunities for trademark infringement.

article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

If nothing else, litigants know where they stand in these jurisdictions. 2009) (holding that a contract was not preempted by copyright). And to characterize zero-click online terms of use that are imposed by cease-and-desist letter as enforceable contracts is horrible policy and bad law. Health Grades, Inc. 634 F.Supp.2d

article thumbnail

Game On! Bright Data Scores Major Victory in Web-Scraping Dispute with Meta (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

LinkedIn case, which up until now was the most important case in the history of US web-scraping litigation. The 2009 Facebook Terms included the following clause: “accessing or using our website. at 18 (quoting the 2009 version of the Terms at issue in Fteja v. He presided over the famous hiQ Labs v. signif[ies] that you.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 8- May 13)

SpicyIP

Gaurangi Kapoor highlights the key aspects of the litigation and writes on the findings of the court. Case: Holyland Marketing Pvt. They further argued that they had issued a cease and desist notice on 6th November, 2020 to which no response was received. vs Vijay Pal Vineet Kumar And Co.

Trademark 104