article thumbnail

HIT NETFLIX CONTENT AND THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT THAT FOLLOWS

JIPL Online

7] Before the court could decide if the subtitled version, a type of derivative work, could still be protected even if the underlying film on its own was available to be used by all, both parties settled. [8]. 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] 11] The case has also been settled. [12] 21, 2020), [link]. [3]

article thumbnail

AN ARGUMENT FOR EMBRACING THE LEGALITY OF CROWDFUNDED GAME MODS

JIPL Online

Mods are beneficial for the video game industry, [3] but mods can threaten a company’s copyright exclusivity because of their status as derivative works. [4] Section 106 of the Copyright Act grants copyright holders an exclusive right to make or license derivative works based upon a previously copyrighted work. [11]

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Is Fanfiction Legal?

JIPEL Copyright Blog

The problem is that most fanfiction could be characterized as derivative works of other already existing original works, as defined in 17 U.S.C. § Despite the barriers to fanfiction that the derivative work doctrine raises, fanfiction writers may find relief from liability through the fair use doctrine.

article thumbnail

The Risks of Dual Licensing in The Pioneering Landscape of Contemporary Open Source

Traverse Legal Blog

Third, a change in licensing can have downstream effects on derivative works and integrations, potentially leading to legal disputes or claims of copyright or patent infringement. First, you may need to secure permissions from every contributor to the project, a logistical issue for larger, more collaborative initiatives.

article thumbnail

The Risks of Dual Licensing in The Pioneering Landscape of Contemporary Open Source

LexBlog IP

Third, a change in licensing can have downstream effects on derivative works and integrations, potentially leading to legal disputes or claims of copyright or patent infringement. First, you may need to secure permissions from every contributor to the project, a logistical issue for larger, more collaborative initiatives.

article thumbnail

Let’s Go Hazy: Making Sense of Fair Use After Warhol

Copyright Lately

Alas, Campbell’s discontinued Pepper Pot in 2010. In an aside that no doubt made the MPAA smile, the Court also confirmed that unauthorized derivative works like book-to-film adaptations won’t pass muster under the first fair use inquiry merely because they have a different aesthetic than the works they borrow.

article thumbnail

If “Trespass to Chattels” Isn’t Limited to “Chattels,” Anarchy Ensues–Best Carpet Values v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Nevertheless, because adware often provided poor consumer experiences, adware largely fizzled out by 2010. ” No, that’s exactly what the derivative work right covers, and it’s the exact issue litigated in the old WhenU cases. WhenU concluded that copyright was a dead-end. 1-800 Contacts v. Silvaco Data Sys.