Remove 2011 Remove Branding Remove False Advertising Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Real Real Not So “Real” Chanel, Inc. The luxury fashion And clothing brand

IP and Legal Filings

. (“Chanel”), is an iconic fashion company based in New York known for its luxury fashion products and owns rights to several Chanel and CC monograms trademarks associated with the brand design. The brand was not involved with selling secondly handed or vintage goods. Veronique Idea Corp., 2d 262, 267 (S.D.N.Y.

article thumbnail

Kentucky bourbon distilled in Indiana?

43(B)log

Fresh Bourbon allegedly falsely advertises that Fresh Bourbon is the “first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky,” and makes other related false claims, which is allegedly false because it’s not a distillery, which requires both federal (TTB) and Kentucky (KABC) licenses. POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Gerber's Good Start troubles continue

43(B)log

Plaintiffs alleged that these ads were false and misleading because there was no scientific evidence supporting the claim that GSG reduced the risk of developing certain allergies or atopic dermatitis. 2) A print magazine advertisement described GSG as the “1st Formula with FDA qualified health claim.” (3)

article thumbnail

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

43(B)log

Industria, based on Colombia, produces and distributes food products under two relevant brand names: Zenú and Ranchera. They’re successful brands: approximately $300,000,000 annually in sales of Zenú products and $100,000,000 in sales of Ranchera products. So, did Industria satisfy Lexmark ? This makes Colombians abroad get tricked.”

article thumbnail

RealReal Not So “Real”

IP and Legal Filings

. (“Chanel”), is an iconic fashion company based in New York known for its luxury fashion products and owns rights to several Chanel and CC monograms trademarks associated with the brand design. The brand was not involved with selling second handed or vintage goods. 1114(1)(a) on a direct infringement theory ( Chanel, Inc.

article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. lululemon’s brand also displays prominently in its keyword ads. If they really wanted to build their business, they could have invested that money into marketing instead of legal fees. Labeled search results.

article thumbnail

False endorsement remains broader than many state ROP laws

43(B)log

American Girl Brands, LLC, 2021 WL 510729, No. In a 2011 presentation, Walkowicz discussed their work on NASA’s Kepler Mission studying the constellation Lyra, including the constellation’s brightest star, called Vega.” Not to mention that “dilution” is not the same thing as false endorsement! Walkowicz v. 20-cv-374-jdp (W.D.

Law 59