This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove 2015 Remove Artistic Work Remove Artwork Remove Copyright Law
article thumbnail

Fair Use for Documentaries in US Copyright Law: Brown v Netflix

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JUNE 30, 2021

Furthermore, the Second Circuit stated that there was “virtually no possibility” of usurpation where the original work was “a children’s song intended for an all-ages audience” and the infringing work was “clearly intended for adult audiences” (citing Lombardo v. Dr. Seuss Enters., 3d 497, 512, S.D.N.Y. Google, Inc. by Tito Rendas. €

Fair Use 103
Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Law 103
article thumbnail

Traditional Tattoos on the Red Carpet: Continuing the Conversation of Collective Ownership

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws.

Ownership 103
Ownership Intellectual Property Artwork Copyright Law 103
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 9,000+ Insiders by signing up for our newsletter

About
About
Editions
Editions
Topics
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024