43(B)log

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived.

False Advertising 99

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Business 99

43(B)log

MARCH 28, 2024

26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. Defendants counterclaimed for payment and damages for breach of contract and bad faith.

Advertising 64

Advertising Advertising Settlement Contracts 64

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 19, 2021

Plaintiff attempted to plead that a small number of calls to people contracting with it constituted “commercial advertising or promotion,” but the court still didn’t buy it. The parties compete to manage vacation rental properties located in Oregon, and plaintiff alleged a smear campaign against it. In Grubbs v. Sheakley Grp.,

Advertising 59

Advertising Advertising Marketing Marketing 59

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 7, 2023

It also, allegedly, obtained access to analytical tools from Brandwatch , a market intelligence consultant. Brandwatch, obtains data from Twitter under a contract, and then offers various tools to analyze its database. Based on the complaint, a 43(a)(1)(B) false advertising cause is a bit of an uphill battle.

Social Media 52

Social Media Reporting Contracts False Advertising 52

43(B)log

MAY 12, 2022

They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the False Advertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in false advertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. 2015) (cleaned up). 2015) (cleaned up). Superior Court, 9 Cal.5th

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Business 59

43(B)log

AUGUST 12, 2021

Safelite allegedly falsely advertised that (1) “if damage spreads beyond the size of a dollar bill, a replacement will be necessary”; (2) “when a chip is smaller than a dollar bill, it can usually be repaired without replacing the windshield.” can be safe and is viable.” Were plaintiffs’ injuries proximately caused by Safelite?

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Marketing 59

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

Telebrands markets and sells “As Seen on TV” consumer household products via websites, phone numbers, and big box retailers. Telebrands made a pandemic-related effort to market and sell a hand sanitizer product, but retailers were historically reluctant to carry products associated with hemp, so it used “Healthvana” for its hand sanitizer.

False Advertising 64

False Advertising Marketing Marketing Branding 64