IPilogue

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

In 2015, the Cowichan Tribes were faced with the issue yet again when Ralph Lauren launched their own line of Cowichan sweaters. The Cowichan could have had a stronger claim against Ralph Lauren, given that they had already turned their minds to protecting their intellectual property through trademark law.

Ownership 103

Ownership Intellectual Property Artwork Copyright Law 103

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2024

7] , the plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement and requested the issuance of an interim injunction to prevent the defendant’s film “Mohenjo Daro” from being released. Parag Sanghavi, 2015 SCC OnLine Del 11644 [4] Kanungo Media (P) Ltd. 27, 2023) [link] [2] Krishika Lulla v. Mondaq (Dec.

Cinema 76

Cinema Copyright Blogging Registration 76

TorrentFreak

DECEMBER 22, 2022

Since 2015, TIR has made its specialist content available via the website mistressharley.com (NSFW) and through authorized third parties under licensing agreements. In parallel, websites that sell pirated copies of TIR’s copyrighted videos compete in the same market by targeting TIR’s customers. .

Privacy 121

Privacy Copyright Infringement Trademark Copyright 121

SpicyIP

JANUARY 23, 2023

Delhi High Court highlights the need for legislative policy to address the raising cases of copyright infringements by rogue websites. This could have been an opportunity for the court to discuss application of trademark law on buildings, however, the matter was eventually settled out of court.

Designs 105

Designs Design Invention Registration 105

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

Second , it has been argued that the court merely espoused the settled principles of trademark law that ‘common’ names and phrases cannot be monopolized. ” Jarrod Welsh, Copyrighting God: New Copyright Guidelines Do Not Protect Divine Beings, 17 Rutgers Journal Of Law & Religion 121 (2015).

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

Jaitley’s right and pronounced that any person may be restrained from using the names of popular or well-known celebrities, when the particular name is a well-known trademark as envisaged under the basic principles of trademark law and thatcelebrity is entitled to use his name for commercial purposes. 2007, I, no.

Privacy 93

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 93