JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. ix] Just a brief glimpse at a meme can demonstrate just how little copyright protected material is used. [x] 29, 2013), [link]. [ii]

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

Kluwer Copyright Blog

SEPTEMBER 1, 2021

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected Jeff Koons’ fair use argument ( section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 ) based on parody ( Rogers v. Moulinsart, the Belgian company that holds the rights to Tintin, and the heir of the author, Hergé, holder of the moral rights, brought a copyright infringement case against Marabout.

Derivative Work 107

Derivative Work Copyright Law Copyright Law 107

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 31, 2022

ii) For Laughs : Real Infringement Cases Impacted, In The US and Elsewhere, By Claims To Humor To Show Fair Use Or Non-Confusion. ” Many of these issues on the trademark side could be addressed in the Jack Daniels matter if the US Supreme Court grants cert. Eleonora Rosati, “Just a laughing matter?

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Moral Rights Law 52