Remove 2016 Remove Advertising Remove Design Patent Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions.

article thumbnail

TMSR Session 3: Private Actors…and their Machines

43(B)log

Other examples: design patent, as Sarah Burstein has writte n. I also don’t think used, grey market, expired/near expired, repackaged goods, mishandled goods are infringing or counterfeit; the problem if any is that they’re falsely advertised. NYU Press, 2016). Putting pictures side by side often isn’t enough.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The judgement was passed collectively in an appeal against 4 orders (two impugning the 2016 Ericsson v. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. The Division Bench comprised of Justices Najmi Waziri and Vikas Mahajan.

IP 124