Remove 2016 Remove Contracts Remove Derivative Work Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

No Free Use in the Purple Rain – U.S. Supreme Court Finds License of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Infringes Photographer’s Copyright

LexBlog IP

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. scholarship, or research” [2] and is evaluated through multiple factors.

article thumbnail

Software Downloads Netflix & Disney+ Videos to Make DRM-Free Copies

TorrentFreak

It is unlikely that these features will appear on a licensed mainstream service but that doesn’t stop subscribers from desiring them. for a ‘lifetime’ license. You agree that as a condition of your license, you will not: i. People Want to Download and Keep Movies & TV Shows. Copyright Law and DRM.

Copying 116
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The Battle Over Poker NFTs

Plagiarism Today

” The case raises questions of fair use and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works. Three years later, she licensed one of those photos of Vanity Fair who, with permission, commissioned a new work based on it by Andy Warhol.

Fair Use 243
article thumbnail

WIPIP Concurrent Session #3: Copyright Doctrine

43(B)log

Hughes: it was the Fairness in Music Licensing Act, not the DMCA, which was intertwined. Before 2016, appeared to be that these multipliers were impermissible punitive damages. In 2016, Leonard v. Lemley: Patent law uses the actual license amount; there’s no reason to use a multiplier when we actually know.

article thumbnail

Is Trump’s Copyright Claim Against Woodward “Trumped Up”?

LexBlog IP

The audiobook, The Trump Tapes , is comprised of 20 audio interviews, one with Trump during his presidential campaign in 2016 and the remaining 19 from the interviews conducted during his term as president. According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution.

article thumbnail

A Preliminary Analysis of Trump’s Copyright Lawsuit Over Interview Recordings (Trump v. Simon & Schuster) (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The lawsuit involves sound recordings of 19 interviews that then-President Trump voluntarily gave to Woodward between December 2019 and August 2020, plus one interview from 2016 (when Trump was still a candidate). The Falwell court was on solid ground in denying relief on the grounds of an implied license. complaint filed Jan.

Copyright 119
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Legal Background: Copyright and Derivative Works Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,” 17 U.S.C. For obvious reasons, the copyright in a photograph does not include the right to publicly perform the copyrighted work.