2016 Copying Design Patent False Advertising 
Patently-O
APRIL 17, 2024
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 30, 2023
The judgement was passed collectively in an appeal against 4 orders (two impugning the 2016 Ericsson v. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. The Division Bench comprised of Justices Najmi Waziri and Vikas Mahajan.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
115 
Let's personalize your content