2016 Design Patent False Advertising Invention 
Patently-O
APRIL 17, 2024
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 30, 2023
Controller of Patents where the Court emphasised the requirement of the plurality of invention in divisional applications and held that plurality should be disclosed in the claims. The judgement was passed collectively in an appeal against 4 orders (two impugning the 2016 Ericsson v. Intex Technologies (India) Ltd.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
115 
Let's personalize your content