Remove 2017 Remove Cease and Desist Remove Marketing Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

ITC Litigation: Introduction to Trade Secret Protection at the ITC

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

5] This represents a missed opportunity—and potentially a market inefficiency—for companies looking to enforce trade secrets that have been misappropriated abroad. the ITC can also issue cease and desist orders to prevent further sales of the accused products. 2d 1325, 1327, 2017 WL 6327551, at *3 (E.D. 11, 2017). [8]

article thumbnail

Evaluating the Constitutionality of Viewpoint-Neutral Trademark Registration Laws That Do Not Restrict Speech—Vidal v. Elster (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Examples of trademark experts with this view include professors Rebecca Tushnet and Jennifer Rothman ; attorneys Megan Bannigan, David Bernstein, Timothy Cuffman , and Jon Jekel ; and news reporters from the New York Times ( Adam Liptak ) and Bloomberg ( Greg Stohr ). Tam (2017) and Iancu v.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 6- February 12)

SpicyIP

Regardless, it sent a cease and desist to the defendants in 2022 who have a shop in Jaipur with a similar name and have registered the word mark in 2013. When, therefore, another identical vanilla cream filled chocolate sandwich cookie enters the market, named ―FAB!O‖

Designs 52