2018 Copying Ownership Settlement 
The IP Law Blog
AUGUST 26, 2021
The crux of the case turned on the meaning of the phrase, “exclusive ownership,” which the California legislature used in California’s copyright statute in 1872. In essence, if Flo & Eddie prevailed in any of the three appeals, they would be entitled to an additional $5 million under the settlement agreement. In 1908, the U.S.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. This is the initial copying design (without of the background graphics in the precedent work): The copyright registrant alleged this copying design constituted copyright infringement. The registrant counternoticed each time.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TorrentFreak
JULY 13, 2023
Pirate site brands, including 123movies, Putlocker, Kisscartoon, 123movieshub, and GoMovies, were suddenly recognized all over the world, despite in many cases having been copied from ‘pirate’ brands already in existence. As the image below shows, Zoro.to’s nameserver records have now been updated to point to ns3 and ns4.films.org.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 26, 2021
” The crux of the case turned on the meaning of the phrase, “exclusive ownership,” which the California legislature used in California’s copyright statute in 1872. In essence, if Flo & Eddie prevailed in any of the three appeals, they would be entitled to an additional $5 million under the settlement agreement.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 26, 2021
” The crux of the case turned on the meaning of the phrase, “exclusive ownership,” which the California legislature used in California’s copyright statute in 1872. In essence, if Flo & Eddie prevailed in any of the three appeals, they would be entitled to an additional $5 million under the settlement agreement.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
No earlier than July 31, 2023 per settlement. No earlier than November 20, 2023 per settlement. . No earlier than June 30, 2023 per settlement. December 14, 2018. first submission May 2017; resubmitted June 2018). first submission May 2017; resubmitted June 2018). November 28, 2018. November 2, 2018.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 30, 2021
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that California Civil Code section 980(a)(2) , which grants “exclusive ownership” of a sound recording fixed before February 15, 1972, to its “author,” provides only an exclusive right of reproduction and distribution, and does not provide an exclusive right of public performance.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content