Remove 2021 Remove Advertising Remove Copyright Remove Service Mark
article thumbnail

TTAB Dismisses MANDALAEVERYWEAR Opposition; Opposer Proved Prior Advertisement But Not Prior Rendering of Services

The TTABlog

Opposer James Barnard claimed prior use of the mark MANDALA for business consulting and branding services, and alleged likelihood of confusion with the Applicant's proposed mark MANDALAEVERYWEAR for marketing consulting services. 91252489 (June 16, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances S. Welch 2021.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 34: TTAB Affirms Nonuse Refusal - Service Mark Use Requires Rendering of the Services, Not Just Preparation

The TTABlog

Applicant Suuberg made preparatory measures to use the mark but never rendered the services before her filing date. 88234650 (December 10, 2021) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas). The CAFC declared that "an applicant’s preparations to use a mark in commerce are insufficient to constitute use in commerce.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Dastar doesn't bar allegedly false advertising about source of planned development services

43(B)log

Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. Defendants' letter allegedly copied text from LStar Trademark infringement: LStar never specified what its trademarks or service marks were. Not every word on a label or ad is a mark. LStar Development Gp., 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C. LStar didn’t plead its own trademark use.

article thumbnail

TM infringement and false advertising claims related to putative open source software "fork" succeed

43(B)log

PureThink, LLC, 2021 WL 2483778, No. May 18, 2021) Neo4j specializes in graph database management systems. Doing so removed certain legal notices identifying Neo4j Sweden as the copyright holder and licensor, and removed the Commons Clause, effectively allowing Defendants to commercially use and support ONgDB.” Neo4j, Inc.

article thumbnail

TTAB Denies Petition to Cancel "ONEPACKET" Registration: Failure to Prove Nonuse

The TTABlog

The record consisted only of circumstantial evidence of abandonment; Equinix did not take the testimony of respondent regarding its use or nonuse of the mark, and respondent did not respond to Equinix's discovery requests. 92069714 (July 2, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2021.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 26: TTAB Denies "HAPPIEST HOUR" Cancellation Petition for Failure to Prove Priority Via Technical or Analogous TM Use

The TTABlog

Petitioner claimed that its restaurant had a "soft opening" in September 2014, with the mark THE HAPPIEST HOUR displayed on signage, but its evidence was "contradictory, inconsistent, and indefinite." Several press releases were issued at that time, but they did not constitute service mark use. Carson , 2021 USPQ2d 1057, at *21.

article thumbnail

"NAMX" Not Confusable with "NYMEX" for Electronic Financial Services, Says TTAB

The TTABlog

the degree of purchaser care) and the dissimilarity of the marks" outweighed the other DuPont factors. 91225279 (September 10, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. Second, the representative samples of Opposer’s advertising focus on the CME GROUP mark and CME GROUP logo, not the NYMEX mark.