Remove 2024 Remove Article Remove Design Patent Remove Invention
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Overrules Rosen-Durling Test for Design Patent Obviousness

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch In a highly anticipated en banc decision, the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding Rosen-Durling test for assessing obviousness of design patents. May 21, 2024) (en banc). Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate design patent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. ยง

article thumbnail

Seeking Clarity on Comparison Prior Art: Seirus Petitions Supreme Court in Heat Wave Design Patent Dispute

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running design patent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Questions presented: When looking for comparison prior art, is the article’s function relevant in any way? Must the comparison prior art be the “same article” as claimed?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit to Decide Whether KSR Applies to Design Patents

LexBlog IP

1] LKQ, an auto parts repair vendor for GM, successfully petitioned for inter partes review of GM’s design patent for a front fender design, [2] arguing it was anticipated by a prior art reference (Lain) and obvious over Lian alone or in combination with a brochure for the 2010 Hyundai Tucson. GM Global Tech.

article thumbnail

CIPO Fees to Increase by 25% in 2024 and Expansion of the Definition of โ€œSmall Entityโ€

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (โ€œCIPOโ€) has announced that effective January 1, 2024, most official fees will be increasing by 25%. On the patent side, the increase in the fees will be applicable to standard entity size. Thus, small entity patent applicants will only experience CIPOโ€™s regular annual fee increase in 2024.

article thumbnail

TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(5) Functionality Refusal of Holster Configuration

The TTABlog

Once again, the existence of a patent established the functional benefits of the design: it "enables the user to secure the holster within the waistband, and the gun within the holster, with minimal bulkiness and weight and with maximum comfort." 90518181 (February 27, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C.

article thumbnail

N.D. Cal. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Casesโ€“Viral DRM v. YouTube Schedule A Defendants

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

YouTube Uploaders Listed on Schedule A , 2024 WL 189013 (N.D. 17, 2024) * * * Bonus 1: The court issued a related ruling, Viral DRM LLC v. Onyshchuk , 2024 WL 189011 (N.D. This is a design patent SAD Scheme case. For this and many other reasons, I reiterate: #StopTheSADScheme. Case Citation : Viral DRM LLC v.

article thumbnail

Design Patent Obviousness Inquiry Is Up for Review at the CAFC

LexBlog IP

GM Global Technology to rule on the issue of whether the current test for determining obviousness of design patents, i.e., the Rosen/Durling Standard, is proper in view of the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR v. The en banc case will be held on February 5, 2024 and will be available for streaming here. Hunter Mfg.,