The IP Law Blog
MARCH 14, 2024
On February 12, 2024, a District Court in the Northern District of California issued its Order and ruled on the OpenAI defendants’ motions to dismiss various claims in the two pending putative class action lawsuits. (It The author plaintiffs alleged that OpenAI infringed on their published works by using these works to help train its LLM.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 22, 2024
Basically, because an NFT is an encoded digital metadata file of a copy of a work that can be copyright protected. That is, in an NFT there can be an underlying copy of a work of art –typically an image, photograph, piece of music, video or certain audiovisual content– that may be subject to copyright. And why is that?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
MARCH 14, 2024
On February 12, 2024, a District Court in the Northern District of California issued its Order and ruled on the OpenAI defendants’ motions to dismiss various claims in the two pending putative class action lawsuits. (It OpenAI, Inc.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 3, 2024
On 19 March 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision on the appeal in the Lidl v Tesco case ( [2024] EWCA Civ 262 ), holding as follows. On infringement, the judge found that the similarities were sufficiently close to be more likely a result of copying than coincidence and so it was for Tesco to explain those similarities.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 15, 2024
The court rejected the conclusory assertion that every output of ChatGPT is an infringing derivative work, finding that plaintiffs had failed to allege “what the outputs entail or allege that any particular output is substantially similar – or similar at all – to [plaintiffs’] books.” 12, 2024) (Dkt.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 17, 2024
The plaintiff gets an expensive lesson in the law of derivative works. * * * UIRC offers bonds using a private placement memorandum (PPM) and an indenture of trust. There was no question about the copying–the revised William Blair documents sloppily retained references to UIRC). Copyright Protection for Legal Documents.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 12, 2024
The plaintiffs lost al of the framing cases then, but here we are in 2024, still litigating framing cases. The Ninth Circuit fixes that obvious error, saying the chattel in question “are the copies of Plaintiffs’ websites.” The “copies” in question are not copies in the abstract sense.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
112 
Let's personalize your content