Remove Advertising Remove Copyright Remove Designs Remove Service Mark
article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Is CROSSFIRST BANK & Circle Design Confusable with Banc of California's RIng Design?

The TTABlog

California claimed that its ring design mark is commercially strong, but its evidence did not relate solely to the ring mark. It included evidence regarding use of that mark with the bank name. Nor did California put its advertising expenses "in context," i.e., in comparison with the expenditures of other banks.

Designs 67
article thumbnail

TM infringement and false advertising claims related to putative open source software "fork" succeed

43(B)log

The parties previously partnered nonexclusively so that PureThink would sell and support the commercial version of Neo4j; upon termination, PureThink expressly agreed to “cease using any trademarks, service marks and other designations of Plaintiffs.” Summary judgment granted on state and federal false advertising claims.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

"GET ORDAINED" Fails to Function as a Source Indicator for Ordination-Related Services, Says TTAB

The TTABlog

“become ordained” or “become a minister,” is strong evidence that Applicant’s consumers will perceive “get ordained” not as a service mark but rather for the commonly understood meaning of the words. Its intent that the phrase function as a service mark is irrelevant. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2022.

article thumbnail

Marketing and IPR

IP and Legal Filings

A trade name often is designated by the term “doing business as,” “trading as,” or “operating as” to make this distinction from the legal name. This is created through personal contact with the client in connection with the use of services or products, contact with sales or client support, or through brand communication (marketing).

article thumbnail

Print-on-Demand Services Face More Legal Woes–Canvasfish v. Pixels

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The print-on-demand service at issue is Pixels, who has appeared on this blog before. The plaintiff paints fish, has a trademark in his name, “DeYoung,” and has registered copyrights. The plaintiff claims that Pixels’ users upload infringing images and refer to them by the trademark DeYoung. Trademark Infringement.

Artwork 96
article thumbnail

Trademark: What’s In it for You?

Velocity of Content

As readers of Velocity of Content know, the US has had a copyright statute on the books since 1790, following closely on the heels of the (then) freshly minted copyright and patent clause in the Constitution. Copyright Office, after what amounts to a much lighter review process. See also: RC Cola, Polar Cola, Jolt!—and

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products

The TTABlog

Applicant manufactures, advertises and sells, under the stylized HME mark, goods that opposer previously sold, to customers who previously were opposer’s customers in the United. The Marks: The Board found the involved marks to be similar in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. Text Copyright John L.