LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
13] Instead, the Second Circuit held that the differences between the works are more akin to the differences between a novel and an adaptation of that novel—“a paradigmatic example” of a derivative work that would require a license. [14]. It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12]
Art Law Journal
JUNE 30, 2022
You don’t want to spend money on marketing and development only to find later that you did not receive trademark approval or received a cease and desist from another company because you were infringing on their trademark and didn’t know it.
Art Law Journal
JUNE 30, 2022
You don’t want to spend money on marketing and development only to find later that you did not receive trademark approval or received a cease and desist from another company because you were infringing on their trademark and didn’t know it.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
97 
Let's personalize your content