Art Law Intellectual Property Licensing Marketing 
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 3, 2022
Bowrey argues that the rise in availability and popularity of crime, mystery and detective stories was sponsored by changes to copyright commercialisation practices, which facilitated the full potential of modern copyright law to be exploited internationally. Chapter 6, ‘Why does a gramophone maker deserve a copyright?
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
A few years later, in 1984, Goldsmith’s agency, which had retained the rights to those images, licensed one of them to Vanity Fair for use in an article called “Purple Fame.” That factor asks “whether, if the challenged use becomes widespread, it will adversely affect the potential market for the copyrighted work.” [20]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 18, 2022
Vanity Fair licensed one of Goldsmith’s Prince photographs to use in a Vanity Fair article. When Goldsmith became aware of the Vanity Fair cover image, she informed the Foundation’s director of licensing that she believed the cover infringed her copyright. In 1984, Prince released Purple Rain and his popularity exploded.
Art Law Journal
JUNE 16, 2022
The theft of your intellectual property, also known as an infringement, is not that different from any theft of your property — except you can’t go to the police to help you get justice. Actual damages represent the money that would have been received if the artist had sold or licensed it to the infringer.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content