Artistic Work Marketing Presentation Public Domain 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 8, 2023
Therefore, such AI-generated works are said to compete directly with human-authored works and thus might be capable of disturbing the market for low creativity works, which is where apparently many artists nowadays make a living.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 2, 2023
A new breed of artists is using generative artificial intelligence tools like DALL·E, Midjourney, Firefly, and ChatGPT to create artistic works. Do these creations belong to the artists or the public domain? Do creators who use generative AI maintain copyright in their creations? By guest blogger Prof.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 20, 2022
Lame comparisons apart, this story is interesting as it is an opportunity to discuss the protectability of artistic works under Italian laws. We have an artwork, displayed in a museum and which is in the public domain. Scenario 3 – Reproduction of artworks displayed in a public space and in the public domain.
IP and Legal Filings
MARCH 29, 2022
With evolution and development in recent trends and creations, every person got the right to protect their artistic creativity by acquiring intellectual property rights to save their invention from being violated by the competition present in the market. Image Source: gettyimage]. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY KIN OF E-COMMERCE.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
Also in its amended opinion, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Google , the court placed newfound emphasis on the consideration of the “public benefits” the copying will likely produce as part of its analysis of the fourth fair use factor—the effect of the use on the market for the original.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
Addressing Factor 4, it asserted there was little or no market harm, because “time-shifting merely enables a viewer to see … a work which he had been invited to witness in its entirety free of charge.” ( Id. This is the familiar four-factor test for fair use. at 450) (Skipping commercials was not yet feasible, id.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 19, 2022
Summary of current treatment: Although courts have often referred to “expressive” or “artistic” works as shorthand for the scope of Rogers, they have applied it to speech that quali?es Lemley: Hard to separate artists from art. TM bullying w/ a public domain quilt, claiming rights over “Dear Jane” as quilt/software.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
110 
Let's personalize your content