LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 27, 2022

Judges: Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Ziff Davis, Inc. Cnsl: Davis Firm; Vasquez Benisek & Lindgren. Creative Magnetic Solutions LLC v. Jack in the Box Inc. Butcher; District Judge Todd W. Claims: Infringement. Defendant: Jack In The Box Inc. Plaintiff: Creative Magnetic Solutions LLC. Noblewood IP LLC v. Claims: Infringement.

Reporting 52

Reporting Litigation Patent IP 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. Stacey Dogan & Jessica Silbey: Jack Daniels & the False Promise of Trademark Use. HomeVestors: title of TV show.

Trademark 59

Trademark Fair Use Registration False Advertising 59

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 22, 2023

33] And let’s not forget the elephant in the room, the USPTO, which, as the issuer of patents, has the right to ask for ownership information and the recordation of secured interests throughout the administrative process, particularly as it comes to the broad fee-setting and fee-paying authority it has over the patents it issues and reviews.

Litigation 125

Litigation Reporting Settlement Government 125