Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 22, 2024
Technically, from a copyright perspective, the NFTs were derivative works of the Paintings (underlying works), since the former included major copyrightable elements of the (previously created) latter. More from our authors: International Cybersecurity and Privacy Law in Practice, Second Edition by Charlotte A.
The IPKat
OCTOBER 1, 2022
Some IP Thoughts on Dolce & Gabbana’s SS23 Collection Curated by Kim Kardashian, and other Fashion Heritage at Fashion Week By Felicia Caponigri During Milan Fashion Week held last week, the Italian fashion brand Dolce & Gabbana debuted their Spring/Summer 2023 ready-to-wear collection. As in the U.S.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Tech Blog
JANUARY 4, 2023
In turn, this attracts interest from businesses ranging from fashion and sports brands, sport teams, designers, game developers, and other content owners. The exclusivity of exploitation is key to the success of a limited-edition collectible. Is this the same in the US and China? If yes, under what circumstances? The United States.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 13, 2022
According to Miramax, the creation of the NFTs constituted copyright infringement because they were unauthorized derivative works of Pulp Fiction. [23] On February 9, 2022, Rothschild file a motion to dismiss the Complaint, arguing that he had “every right to make and sell art that depict branded products.” 53]. * * *.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 4, 2023
In turn, this attracts interest from businesses ranging from fashion and sports brands, sport teams, designers, game developers, and other content owners. The exclusivity of exploitation is key to the success of a limited-edition collectible. Is this the same in the US and China? If yes, under what circumstances? The United States.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
120 
Let's personalize your content