SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

The court further held that “mere international usage of the ‘ALPHARD’ trademark by the Petitioner company is not sufficient to prove spillover of its transnational reputation in India” Delhi High Court grants an interim injunction to the Plaintiff, despite non-use of the mark for 30 years.

Design 52

Design Designs Trademark Cease and Desist 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 5, 2022

Discussing the Recent Patent Application Restorations by Delhi and Madras High Courts. We discussed the recent orders from Delhi and Madras High Court regarding restoration of ‘deemed abandoned’ patent applications. Indiyaa Distribution Network Llp vs P Singh & Ors. vs Regent Beers And Wines Limited & Ors.

Trademark 91

Trademark Registering Trademarks Registration IP 91

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so we have a fair sprinkling of cases dealing with copyright, patents, trademarks, competition law etc. Master Arnesh Shaw vs Union of India [Delhi High Court]. Hetero Drugs Ltd [Delhi High Court]. In H Lundbeck A/S v.

IP 134

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 134

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The final selection of all the lists, their summaries and mistakes (if any) remain those of the authors’ alone. The judgement was authored by Justice C. Swapnil Patil.

IP 109

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 109

LexBlog IP

APRIL 3, 2023

This decision indicates that an SEP owner sometimes might need to provide information to a prospective licensee (under a confidentiality agreement), although that may not be necessary for an experienced licensee who can consult existing patent licenses they have entered with others. are finally de4termined.

Licensing 52

Licensing Technology Intellectual Property Patent 52