Remove patent-final-office-action-vs-non-final-office-action
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 29- December 5)

SpicyIP

We discussed the recent updates in Delhi, Madras and Calcutta High Courts, regarding adjudication of intellectual property right matters. Highlighting the change in roster of the Intellectual Property Division (IPD), we also discussed the progress, with regard to similar arrangements, in Calcutta and Madras High Courts.

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 6- February 12)

SpicyIP

The court further held that “mere international usage of the ‘ALPHARD’ trademark by the Petitioner company is not sufficient to prove spillover of its transnational reputation in India” Delhi High Court grants an interim injunction to the Plaintiff, despite non-use of the mark for 30 years.

Designs 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so we have a fair sprinkling of cases dealing with copyright, patents, trademarks, competition law etc. Master Arnesh Shaw vs Union of India [Delhi High Court]. Hetero Drugs Ltd [Delhi High Court]. In H Lundbeck A/S v.

IP 143
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The final selection of all the lists, their summaries and mistakes (if any) remain those of the authors’ alone. The judgement was authored by Justice C. Swapnil Patil.

IP 124
article thumbnail

India’s High Court of Delhi issues guidance on SEP licensing that seeks to harmonize decisions in other countries (Intex v. Ericsson)

LexBlog IP

This decision indicates that an SEP owner sometimes might need to provide information to a prospective licensee (under a confidentiality agreement), although that may not be necessary for an experienced licensee who can consult existing patent licenses they have entered with others. are finally de4termined.