Indiana Intellectual Property Law

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

The Plaintiff claims that Par-Kan had knowledge of the ‘940 and ‘123 patents because these patents are continuations of U.S. 8,221,047 , which Unverferth sued Par-Kan over in a similar infringement case in 2013 and had received subpoenas and a cease-and-desist letter , identifying the patents by numbers.

Cease and Desist 97

Cease and Desist Patent Infringement Patent Patent Law 97

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

The Cost of Protecting Intellectual Property- A typical scenario for a patent infringement lawsuit may begin with some potential defendant selling a product. This potential defendant may receive a cease-and-desist letter which the defendant, for whatever reason, ignores.

Cease and Desist 52

Cease and Desist Settlement Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 9, 2022

Brooks”) cease and desist the use of the Mark NITRO mark in connection with footwear. PUMA also alleges that the Brooks shoe the “Aurora BL” infringes upon their Design Patent No. D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. The parties were unable to reach a settlement.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Cease and Desist Trademark Design Patent 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 5, 2021

We have covered several introductory topics about 337 Investigations at the International Trade Commission (ITC) through the lens of its most common context [1] —as another forum for patent litigation. [2] patent; and 3) that an industry with respect to articles protected by the patent exists or is in the process of being established. [3]

Litigation 52

Litigation Cease and Desist Patent Infringement Intellectual Property 52