Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 1, 2021

A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). SecurityPoint brought its claim for patent infringement against the United States under 28 U.S.C.

Patent Infringement 246

Patent Infringement Patent Government Licensing 246

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

OCTOBER 2, 2023

million jury verdict that had previously been awarded to Teva in a patent infringement suit regarding the two companies’ development of drugs with antibodies capable of treating headache disorders associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (“CGRP”).

Patent Infringement 98

Patent Infringement Patent 98

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She is keenly interested in Intellectual Property Law, Technology Law, and Corporate Law. It did so in a bid to establish patent infringement albeit Biological E Limited (“defendants”) using a different process to prepare the product.

Patent Infringement 105

Patent Infringement Patent Marketing Marketing 105

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

involves an allegation of patent infringement over United States Patent No. Court documents state the patent at issue is for a “Vessel Rinsing Apparatus,” that was issued on August 15, 2023. 11,725,369.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent 52

JD Supra Law

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

The Utility of Patents and Infringement- Patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry is a very valuable tool used, not only to protect the property rights of a potential new drug, but also, to protect a potential revenue stream large enough to allow recovery of costs associated with the development of a drug.

Intellectual Property Law 52

Intellectual Property Law Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Patent 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DECEMBER 8, 2023

They are alleging patent infringement concerning U.S. The complaint states that the Plaintiff (OP) has designed and patented an innovative orthopedic plate system explicitly made for pediatric patients. 8,777,998 , titled “Pediatric Long Bone Support or Fixation Plate.”

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Designs Design 52

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

The Cost of Protecting Intellectual Property- A typical scenario for a patent infringement lawsuit may begin with some potential defendant selling a product. Next thing: you must defend against a patent infringement suit. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law

Cease and Desist 52

Cease and Desist Settlement Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

An important takeaway from this case is that careful consideration should be given to the scope of any forum selection clauses regarding patent infringement or invalidity actions. In Nippon Shinyaku v. Despite this language, Sarepta filed seven petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit disagreed.

Patent Infringement 245

Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Contracts Confidentiality 245

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

LLC for patent infringemen t under U.S. Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 , 281 , 283 , 284 , and 285. 8,967,940 (“the ’940 patent”) and U.S. Kalida, Ohio – The Plaintiff, UNVERFERTH MFG. filed suit against Silver Lake, Indiana company , PAR-KAN CO.,

Cease and Desist 97

Cease and Desist Patent Infringement Patent Patent Law 97

JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 2, 2021

TSA’s Infringement: Even with processes as seemingly obvious as loading, conveying, and stacking security trays, entities such as The Transportation Security Administration are subject to U.S. Court of Federal Claims for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law

Intellectual Property Law 58

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Patent Patent Infringement 58

LexBlog IP

MARCH 5, 2023

Nu Tsai Capital, LLC, [2023-1146] (February 17, 2023), the Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against Lite-Netics patent-related speech, holding that the district court abused its discretion. Patent Nos. Harness IP is celebrating more than 100 years as an intellectual property law firm. patents.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 21, 2023

DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. Patent infringement cases can be complex, and the outcome can have significant implications for both the patent owner and the accused party. Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff, Disintermediation Services, Inc.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Litigation Patent Patent Application 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

An important takeaway from this case is that careful consideration should be given to the scope of any forum selection clauses regarding patent infringement or invalidity actions. In Nippon Shinyaku v. Despite this language, Sarepta filed seven petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit disagreed.

Patent Infringement 130

Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Contracts Confidentiality 130

Intepat

DECEMBER 26, 2023

In the contemporary era, AI plays a significant role in Intellectual Property Rights, becoming increasingly integral during a period where numerous tasks are executed by artificial intelligence. Consequently, it is imperative to recognize that the use of AI itself has become a component of Intellectual Property.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Intellectual Property Law Personality Rights 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

SEPTEMBER 6, 2022

According to the Complaint, Gleason is accused of infringing one or more claims of the 933 Patent by making, using, importing, selling, and/or offering for sale its Model 79441 Multi Position Truck. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Advertising Advertising 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 9, 2022

D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for willful trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114 and Design Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § § 271 and 283.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Cease and Desist Trademark Design Patent 52

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 13, 2021

I was tasked with creating business and marketing materials for the Engineering and Technology practice group, focusing mainly on topics pertaining to patent prosecution. One of the skills I sharpened over the course of my internship was effective and accessible legal writing.

Business 115

Business IP Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 115

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 2, 2021

December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. Following the abrogation of Form 18, patent infringement claims must satisfy the plausibility standard articulated in Bell Atlantic Corp.

Patent Infringement 130

Patent Infringement Patent Technology Art 130

IP Watchdog

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

A group of 25 experts in intellectual property law sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Jonathan Kanter today in support of a business review letter that the group said, “represented a legally sound and evidence-based approach in applying antitrust law to innovative commercial institutions.”

Business 75

Business Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Licensing 75

LexBlog IP

MARCH 8, 2023

district courts, and the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); and more! district courts, and the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); and more! Design Day is co-sponsored by American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO), and the USPTO.

Designs 40

Designs Design Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 40

Intellectual Property Law Blog

DECEMBER 21, 2023

15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. In Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. 2021-2299, 2021-2338 (Fed.

Art 162

Art Design Patent Designs Design 162

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 8, 2023

for patent infringement. Vieneci is accused of patent infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, TeleBrands Corporation , filed suit against Plaintiff, Vieneci Garden, Inc.

Patent Infringement 40

Patent Infringement Patent Television Designs 40

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JUNE 25, 2021

Westwood claims it began notifying the Defendant, Local Radio Networks LLC (“LRN”), regarding its ownership of the Patents in Suit in May 2020. It appears the alleged infringement had not ceased after these communications and therefore Westwood filed suit for willful patent infringement.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Ownership Litigation 52

Larson & Larson

SEPTEMBER 3, 2021

Intellectual property is often traced back to the creativity of humankind. Such creations of the human mind-commonly referred to as intellectual property- have found protection under the law- what is otherwise known as intellectual property law. Violation of Intellectual Property Rights.

Intellectual Property 59

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law IP Copyright 59

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 14, 2023

Batesville”), for patent infringement. Batesville is accused of patent infringement against Patent No.’s Richmond, Indiana –The Plaintiff, Vandor Group, Inc. Vandor”) doing business as Starmark Cremation Products , filed suit against Defendant, Batesville Casket Company, Inc.

Patent Infringement 40

Patent Infringement Social Media Patent Designs 40

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 30, 2021

Because Social claims the Product infringes on at least Claim 1 of the ‘365 Patent, it is seeking damages for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § The case was assigned to Judge James R. Sweeney II and Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker in the Southern District of Indiana assigned Case No. 1:21-cv-01071-JRS-TAB.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

NOVEMBER 24, 2023

According to the complaint, Davaus seeks legal affirmation that their product, the Kernel Keeper™ , does not infringe, is not covered by, and renders invalid the United States Patent No. ” S7 alleged that the Kernel Keeper™ infringed on their patent and demanded Davaus cease its production and sale.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent IP 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 28, 2021

As Digital claims each of these components of the Product are covered by the ‘860 Patent, it is seeking damages for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § It also appears a user can store their e-signature within a document using the Product. The case was assigned to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Tim A.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 9, 2021

Vaxxinova claims Elanco launched a new product family called Nuplura PH+ that allegedly infringes the Patents in Suit after Vaxxinova informed Elanco of the allegations. Therefore, Vaxxinova is seeking damages and fees for willful patent infringement of the Vaxxinova Patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Technology Business 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 25, 2021

Johnson claims it corresponded with KMC’s CEO in July 2020 regarding actual notice of KMC’s infringement of four of the Asserted Patents, but KMC apparently continued the alleged infringement. The case was assigned to Judge Damon R. Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. 3:21-cv-00501-DRL-MGG.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Design Patent Technology 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 1, 2024

It emphasizes the intrinsic evidence as a primary source for claim interpretation and underscores the significance of ensuring that claim terms are adequately defined within the patent specification itself.

Patent 52

Patent Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Patent Infringement 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 2, 2021

New Albany, Indiana – Chief Judge Tanya Walton Pratt for the Southern District of Indiana dismissed a patent infringement suit filed by Plaintiff, Eddie M. infringed on his U.S. Green”) in March 2020 for lack of personal jurisdiction. Green, who claimed Defendants, Ara Yavruyan and Chain Vault Inc.,

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JANUARY 15, 2024

. (“Sanitary Ware” or “Plaintiff”) and Delta Faucet Company (“DFC”) illuminates the complexities faced by international entities selling products on major online platforms like Amazon , particularly concerning allegations of patent infringement.

Patent 52

Patent Patent Infringement Patent Law Technology 52

IPilogue

AUGUST 24, 2022

Furthermore, because they do not practice or develop their manufacture, they experience no risk of patent infringement litigation themselves. . From this description alone, it seems that an NPE’s core business model infringes on the spirit of Intellectual Property law, where innovation is simultaneously protected and encouraged.

Litigation 106

Litigation Patent Troll Patent Technology 106

SpicyIP

MAY 8, 2022

We’re pleased to bring to you a guest post by Eashan Ghosh on the treatment of prosecution history in trade mark infringement proceedings. Eashan has been practicing as an intellectual property advocate and consultant in New Delhi since 2011, and teaches a seminar on intellectual property law at National Law University, Delhi.

Intellectual Property 122

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Registration Law 122

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 3, 2023

Newly promoted principals for 2023 are: Ashley Bolt has experience handling complex patent and intellectual property litigation in U.S. Sara’s IP litigation experience includes both patent litigation and trade secret misappropriation litigation, which often also include various associated breach of contract and business torts.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Journalism Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

OCTOBER 20, 2023

for alleged patent infringement of its fitness products in Bell’s sporting goods stores, including their Indianapolis, Indiana, Bells of Steel USA Showroom. According to the complaint, Rogue Fitness owns several design and utility patents for fitness equipment, including Patent No. Continue reading

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Advertising Advertising 52