SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

The court further held that “mere international usage of the ‘ALPHARD’ trademark by the Petitioner company is not sufficient to prove spillover of its transnational reputation in India” Delhi High Court grants an interim injunction to the Plaintiff, despite non-use of the mark for 30 years.

Designs 52

Designs Design Trademark Cease and Desist 52

The IP Law Blog

MARCH 2, 2021

In Romag , the Court examined whether a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action is required to show that a defendant willfully infringed the plaintiff’s trademark to obtain a profits award. ts, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) the costs of the action. Summary of the Supreme Court’s Opinions. 2019), [link].

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Contracts Trademark Trademark Law 52

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 11, 2022

Speaking of cases involving employees, Patently O ‘s Dennis Crouch did an informal survey of 10 recently filed federal trade secret cases. Fisher & Phillips’ David Walton provides a five-step action plan for making sure your bases are covered if you are filing a claim under the DTSA. One of the cases, Cartiga, LLC v.

Cease and Desist 40

Cease and Desist Journalism Blogging Government 40