patent-final-office-action-vs-non-final-office-action 
SpicyIP
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The court further held that “mere international usage of the ‘ALPHARD’ trademark by the Petitioner company is not sufficient to prove spillover of its transnational reputation in India” Delhi High Court grants an interim injunction to the Plaintiff, despite non-use of the mark for 30 years.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
In Romag , the Court examined whether a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action is required to show that a defendant willfully infringed the plaintiff’s trademark to obtain a profits award. ts, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) the costs of the action. Summary of the Supreme Court’s Opinions. 2019), [link].
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content