Remove companies audi-ag
article thumbnail

Advocate General vs. German Supreme Court – Does the use of four rings on a car grille infringe Audi’s trademark?

The IPKat

Not too long ago, the German Supreme Court held in Kühlergrill (I ZR 61/18, discussed here ) that the sale of the following radiator grille for an Audi A6 infringed Audi’s rights to its figurative trade mark consisting of four interlocking rings. The ring-shaped device is for mounting the original Audi logo.

Art 130
article thumbnail

Four rings on a car grille infringe Audi’s trade mark

The IPKat

As reported here , the Advocate General (‘AG’) did not consider the sale of a non-original radiator grille with a mounting device taking the shape of the Audi logo for an Audi A6 to be infringing. The Court of Justice of the EU (‘CJEU’) disagreed in its recent Audi judgment (case C-334/22 ). 38 et seqq.;

Art 67
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A green slogan is not a trademark, says the General Court

The IPKat

Background German company Groschopp AG Divers & More filed an application for EU trade mark registration of the verbal sign “ Sustainability through Quality ” in classes 7, 9, 16 and 42. A company's attention must therefore be constant, and a compliance plan seems appropriate.

Trademark 132
article thumbnail

Can Slogan Be Registered As A Trademark? – EU Perspective

IP and Legal Filings

Slogans are brief, memorable words that are commonly used in advertising to promote a specific company. Companies seek to protect the value of their trademarks since they can be quite valuable to the brand. Introduction. Using a mark as an advertising slogan, on the other hand, does not prevent it from being registered as a trademark.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Delhi High Court addressed the question of procedural requirements for a pre-grant opposition highlighting the principle of audi alteram partem and held that the Controller should have kept the other party informed of all developments in the case, thus, setting aside the impugned order. In another judgement, Raytheon Company v.

IP 124