Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

NOVEMBER 13, 2020

7] If a branded company initiates an infringement action against a generic company within 45 days of receiving notice of ANDA submission, this triggers a 30-month stay during which FDA cannot issue a final approval for the ANDA. [8] If a branded company gets venue wrong, it risks a motion to dismiss for improper venue.

Branding 52

Branding Brands Branding Litigation 52

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

Hetero Drugs Ltd [Delhi High Court]. Hetero Drugs Ltd, the Delhi High Court ruled that under section 107 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, the export of products from India amounted to the use of the product in India. Entertainment Network India Ltd (ENIL) and Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL) v.

IP 143

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 143

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 24, 2023

vs Tube Investments of India Ltd. & The Respondent/ Opponent was a well-known Chennai based company using its registered BSA mark for selling bicycles and related goods. Case Summaries M/s Blue Heaven Cosmetics Pvt. BSA Business Software Alliance Inc. Inventprise Inc. vs The Controller of Patents & Anr. Koninklijke Philips N.V.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Copyright Registering Trademarks 52

SpicyIP

MAY 15, 2023

Case: Brompton Lifestyle Brands Pvt Ltd vs Yves Saint Laurent And Anr on 9 May, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Image from here Earlier, in the proceedings before the Ld. Case: Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd vs Cian Healthcare Ltd & Anr. Case: Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd vs Cian Healthcare Ltd & Anr.

Trademark 104

Trademark Registration Cease and Desist IP 104

SpicyIP

MAY 6, 2024

Zydus Healthcare Limited vs Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd & Ors on 25 A p ril, 2024 (Delhi High Court) In addition to the directions in the March 5, 2024 order, Flipkart submitted a compliance affidavit disclosing steps of due diligence undertaken by it as an e-commerce marketplace. Electronica India Ltd vs Electronica Hitech Machines Pvt.

Trademark 59

Trademark Invention Licensing Patent 59

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

On the above understanding, the Court restrained 15+ defendants from utilising Anil Kapoor’s name, likeness, image, voice, personality, or any other aspects of his persona for commercial gains, violating his rights, and also directed PDR Ltd., TIPS Industries Ltd. Syngenta Ltd. Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. RDB and Co.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124