Remove companies miami-herald-media-co
article thumbnail

Rounding Up the Supreme Court Briefs in NetChoice v. Paxton, the Challenge to Texas HB20’s Social Media Censorship Law

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

“HB20 may make using dominant social media platforms so distasteful they become virtually unusable for most of the public.” Some interesting co-signers to this brief, including ADL and NAACP. ” CDT et al. ” Chamber of Progress et al. Most platforms share some features in common with traditional publishers.

article thumbnail

YouTube Still Isn’t a State Actor–RFK Jr. v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Weber as the controlling authority for determining whether a social media platform has been rendered a state actor.” Defendants assert that social media platforms have their own First Amendment rights as publishers. 21 citing Miami Herald Pub. LinkedIn Are Social Media Services “State Actors” or “Common Carriers”?

article thumbnail

District Court Enjoins Controversial Texas House Bill 20

LexBlog IP

In short, no one has been happy with how social media platforms self-regulate and both sides believe that, if only Section 230 were amended or even eliminated entirely , their preferred policies would be put in place and the content they (dis)favor would finally be dealt with correctly. The Short Version. d) is unlawful.