The IP Law Blog

NOVEMBER 17, 2022

In patent infringement cases, venue is proper under 28 U.S.C § 1406(a) where either (1) the company accused of infringement is incorporated or (2) where the company has committed acts of infringement and has a “regular and established place of business.” However, the Federal Circuit’s ruling in In re Monolith Power Systems, Inc.

Litigation 98

Litigation Patent Business Patent Infringement 98

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 17, 2022

In patent infringement cases, venue is proper under 28 U.S.C § 1406(a) where either (1) the company accused of infringement is incorporated or (2) where the company has committed acts of infringement and has a “regular and established place of business.” may have reopened that question.

Litigation 52

Litigation Patent Business Patent Infringement 52

Patently-O

OCTOBER 1, 2022

In re Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., — F.4th In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit has denied Monolithic’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking to escape from Judge Albright W.D. Notes – The underlying case alleges infringement of several patents relating to electric power modules.

Patent 64

Patent Business Advertising Advertising 64

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 5, 2023

In re Charter Commc’ns, Inc. , The patents cover various aspects of cable network management, focusing on Cable Modem Termination Systems (CMTS) that serve multiple cable modems. Charter is a Delaware company and does not operate its own retail stores in the Eastern District. In re Monolithic Power Sys.,

Patent Infringement 70

Patent Infringement Business Patent Invention 70

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 19, 2021

Trade secrets can mean big business for companies that hold them, and damages awards for trade secret misappropriation can reach into the hundreds of millions of dollars. In Motorola Solutions, Inc. BIScience, Inc., In Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 436 F.Supp.3d

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Law Patent Publishing 52