Remove companies on-semiconductor-corp
article thumbnail

Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Background Cyntec Company, Ltd. Cyntec sued Chilisin Electronics Corp. To prove damages at trial, Cyntec presented a market-share lost profits theory, alleging that 27 companies purchased Chilisin’s accused chokes outside the United States and then imported devices including the chokes into the United States.

Art 260
article thumbnail

ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: October 2022

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

October saw four complainants file five new Section 337 complaints with the Commission: Bell Semiconductor, LLC, filed a complaint against NXP Semiconductors, NXP B.V., Acer America Corporation, Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies America Corp., Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Minnesota Patent Litigation Wrap-Up: Q1 2022

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Nitride Semiconductors Co. Digi-Key Corp. Plaintiff Nitride Semiconductors (“Nitride”) sued Defendant Digi-Key for selling certain products manufactured by multiple electronics companies that allegedly infringed U.S. 6,861,270, directed to a method of manufacturing semiconductors and LEDs. 2022 WL 816551, *1.

article thumbnail

Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023)

LexBlog IP

” Background Cyntec Company, Ltd. (“Cyntec”) owns patents directed to electronic components for automobiles known as chokes. ” Background Cyntec Company, Ltd. (“Cyntec”) owns patents directed to electronic components for automobiles known as chokes.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?

Patently-O

Auld Company v. Chroma Graphics Corp. , by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit held oral arguments on March 4, 2024 in the important patent case of Celanese Int’l. v ITC , 22-1827 (Fed. Background Celanese developed an improved process for making the artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium ( Ace-K ). Celanese appealed.

Patent 40
article thumbnail

Guest Post: Third-Party Litigation Funding: Disclosure to Courts, Congress, and the Executive

Patently-O

Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2] 2] Virtually nonexistent in the patent space in the U.S. 5] Insurance options are suddenly plentiful, [6] funders are expanding and multiplying, [7] and new deal commitments are on the rise. [8] Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]

article thumbnail

ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: March 2022

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

The ITC monthly wrap-up for March 2022 focuses on two Federal Circuit decisions that help explore two of the major differences between patent litigation in the International Trade Commission (ITC) and federal district court: (1) the form of relief (injunctive relief; not monetary damages), and (2) the domestic industry requirement per 19 U.S.C.