IP Law 360

NOVEMBER 14, 2023

International Trade Commission announced Tuesday that it is investigating alleged infringement related to certain mobile phones, laptops and other related products made by Lenovo and Motorola after Swedish company Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson asked the agency to issue permanent limited exclusion orders and permanent cease and desist orders.

Cease and Desist 40

Cease and Desist IP 40

IP Law 360

OCTOBER 12, 2023

Swedish telecommunications company Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has sued Lenovo and its subsidiary Motorola Mobility, alleging the Chinese company infringes patents related to 5G technology and refuses to engage in negotiations to secure a fair patent licensing deal, according to the suit filed in North Carolina federal court.

Licensing 40

Licensing IP Technology Patent 40

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 13, 2021

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson , 2021 U.S. These standards are covered by tens of thousands of patents around the world (standards-essential patents or SEPs), a respectable number of which are held by Swedish equipment manufacturer Ericsson. In 2016, HTC and Ericsson began negotiations to renew the license.

Licensing 55

Licensing Contracts Patent Law Law 55

IPilogue

DECEMBER 8, 2021

Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“Ericsson”) filed a suit against Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in a federal court of the United States on October 4, 2021. Ericsson requests for a declaration that the license rate ($5 per handset or $2.5

Licensing 106

Licensing Patent Intellectual Property Law Litigation 106

The IPKat

JULY 30, 2023

Here, Ericsson appealed a judgment dated 30th of March 2016 (2016 judgment) which concluded that imposing non-FRAND conditions allows the CCI to act against the violation of sections 3 (collusive practices) and 4 (abuse of dominant position) of the Indian Competition Act. - LPA 550/2016 - Appellant CCI; respondent Ericsson.

Patent 52

Patent Law Licensing IP 52

SpicyIP

JULY 25, 2023

In both disputes, Justice Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court (DHC) had ordered that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) can intervene in patent licensing disputes under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act – first in 2016 ( Ericsson v. CCI ) and then again in 2020 ( Monsanto v. Competition Commission of India and Anr.

Patent 98

Patent Licensing Invention Marketing 98

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson vs Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. The Polo/ Lauren Company L.P Consequently, the defendants were restrained from using their device mark or any similar mark but were allowed to continue using the word mark NILKRANTI, provided it did not infringe on the plaintiffs’ device marks.

Trademark 59

Trademark Copyright IP Registration 59