Copyright Law Fair Use Magazine Public Domain 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. This has important implications for the doctrine of fair use.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement. It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Olartemoure Blog
MAY 26, 2023
The Italian magazine GQ Italia finds itself embroiled in a legal dispute stemming from the publication of an edited image of the renowned David sculpture. This incident has ignited a broader debate concerning the utilization of public domain artworks for commercial purposes.
Dear Rich IP Blog
MARCH 5, 2022
Dear Rich: As I understand copyright, if I visit a park and take a photo of a statute, I own the copyright to the photo and I can use it in a book. But if I open a magazine and take a photo of an illustration, I still own the copyright to the photo, but using it in a book would be a copyright violation.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
JULY 19, 2022
For instance, even though you are permitted to use someone’s image for printed goods like magazines, posters, or brochures, its copyright or Terms of Use may forbid its use online. Recognize the subtleties of fair use. Public domain resources as a starting point.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Fifth, assuming Trump owns a valid copyright, did he grant an implied license to Woodward to publish transcripts of the interviews and/or the recordings themselves? Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment?
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 10, 2024
Government by its officers and employees should not be subject to copyright” and fall “in the public domain.” ” US Const., ” Thus, there are some copyright arguments or policies in play beyond those most immediately considered in the motion papers. is] that works produced for the U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
96 
Let's personalize your content