43(B)log

FEBRUARY 19, 2022

W/o a plan to sell it, there’s definitely no commercial use, but if KitchenAid or Range Rover is doing it, it’s more likely to be commercial speech b/c of the roles they play in the commercial market, but the presumption should be different for an individual. Mazzuco: a linedrawing problem does exist. What do we do with that?

Trademark Law 72

Trademark Law Trademark Art Branding 72

Intepat

JANUARY 17, 2023

Applicants should ensure that it is brief, precise, definite and free from any fancy expressions or ambiguity. No exclusivity can be claimed over anything which is not disclosed in the complete specification and would subsequently become open to public use. The applicant must also state the field in which the invention belongs.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Public Domain Inventor 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MARCH 8, 2023

2 of the CDSMD, stipulating that the above rights cannot be invoked to prohibit the use of works or other subject matter for which protection has expired, has been transposed slavishly into the Greek provision (para. Unsurprisingly, the restriction of Art. Arguably, the most “paternalistic” part of this graduated procedure lies in para.

Publishing 52

Publishing Art Related Rights Marketing 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 10, 2024

Government by its officers and employees should not be subject to copyright” and fall “in the public domain.” ” US Const., It is strange because that would mean that the unpublished portions would also be government works available for public use. “The basic premise of [S]ection 105.[is]

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Government Intellectual Property 52