Remove Derivative Work Remove Licensing Remove Marketing Remove Moral Rights
article thumbnail

WIPIP: In Memoriam and Fair Use

43(B)log

Fair uses tend to divide into buckets: justified by new work; justified by project. New work: Derivative work or embedding work: Cambpell v. Use is justified by context of being placed in new work. If the project is fine, it’s fine to repeat the project with additional works.

article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions

Velocity of Content

It is somehow different from the right to make transformative derivative works (where the word “transformed” is used in Section 101 ) such as film adaptations of books, which clearly require copyright owner consent. 3:22-cv-06823 – Whither transformative? is being used as code. Case 2- Anderson, et al. v Stability A.I.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

x] In fact, on the contrary, memes can operate as a source of marketing and a way to garner interest in creative works in a funny, generationally relevant way. xi] There are countless articles and marketing studies directing corporations on how to market via memes to reach the maximum level of engagement.

article thumbnail

Sweet Sound of Victory: Looking at the Calcutta HC’s Decisive Decision on Rights of Authors

SpicyIP

Saregama Vodafone Injunction against exploitation of copyright in sound recording and allied copyright work via VAS. One of the key features was recognition of the rights of authors of original literary, dramatic, artistic and musical work, used in derivative works. Do A ll Rights Subsist with the First Owner?

Music 59